




































AQUINNO VOLUME 4 ISSUE 3 DECEMBER 2024.cdr


XENOPHOBIA AND NATIONAL IDENTITY: A STUDY AND MORAL EVALUATION 
OF CONTEMPORARY SOUTH AFRICAN-NIGERIAN CONFLICTS ON 

DIGITAL PLATFORMS

Afunugo, Kenechi Nnaemeka
Department of Religion and Human Relations

Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka
nk.afunugo@unizik.edu.ng

ABSTRACT

This study explores the role of digital platforms in shaping xenophobic tensions and national 
identity between South Africans and Nigerians. It uses a qualitative methodology that includes 
content analysis of social media discourse and interviews with affected individuals. Social 
identity theory was utilized in evaluating its observations. The research addresses the growing 
problem of xenophobic rhetoric against Nigerians in South Africa, often fueled by online 
interactions in contemporary times. It seeks to fill a gap in understanding how these digital 
conflicts contribute to national identity formation and exacerbate real-world violence. A moral 
evaluation highlights the ethical responsibilities of individuals; social media platforms, and 
governments in mitigating xenophobic hate speech and promoting intercultural dialogue. The 
findings suggest that digital platforms amplify xenophobic sentiments, creating echo chambers 
that deepen divisions between the two nationalities. This was clearly exemplified in the focus of 
this research which is recent online tensions between Nigerians and South Africans regarding the 
booking and cancellation of ride-hailing services like Bolt and Uber, as well as the frustration 
caused by the increase in online purchases made by Nigerians in South Africa. These purchases 
were often used as pranks, causing financial losses for drivers and businesses. The study 
recommends stricter moderation policies in social media; government-led bilateral dialogues; 
and educational programs that emphasize shared Africans identities and histories to foster mutual 
understanding and reduce conflict. 

Keywords: Xenophobia, National Identity, Moral Evaluation, Digital Platforms, Conflicts.

INTRODUCTION

The role of digital platforms in escalating conflicts and tensions between nationalities cannot be 
overemphasized. In this regards, Zeitzoff (2017) argues in his framework that digital platforms, 
distinctively social media, influences conflicts by reducing communication costs, increasing the 
speed and spread of information, and driving strategic interactions and adaptations among 
conflict actions. He affirms that it provides new data that reshapes available information, 
influencing the dynamics of the conflict itself. Niekerk et al (2013) aver that social media fosters 
information-based conflict by enabling rapid dissemination and access to information, which can 
shape political landscapes and fuel civil disturbances. The authors enunciate that its role in major 
political events, such as the 2009 Iranian elections and the 2011 uprisings in North Africa and the 
Middle East, shows how it can be used to mobilize populations and challenge established 
authorities. Niekerk et al posit that by means of facilitating communication, organization and the 
spread of both accurate and false information, social media services as a tool in strategic security 
and military operations, amplifying its influence in modern conflict. 

Uzochukwu et al (2019) maintain that hate speech on digital platforms, especially social media, 
contributes to societal conflicts by influencing public opinion. Their study highlight the 
difficulty in clearly defining and measuring hate speech, as it can be manipulated to target 

141



opposition or suppress criticism. Relatively, Proctor (2021) portrays that digital space, 
significantly social media, is constantly weaponized in fragile states in fueling conflict through 
disinformation, electoral manipulation, and extremist recruitment. Hochwald (2024) states that 
digital platforms affect intra-state conflicts by amplifying civil society's influence, challenging 
authoritarian regimes, and by shifting power dynamics. He insists that social media have been 
used by both revolutionaries and governments, playing roles in events like the Arab Spring. 
Initially viewed as empowering citizens, the author enunciates that governments now also 
exploit these tools for their own security and control, reshaping conflicts strategies. 

The contemporary South African-Nigerian conflicts on virtual interfaces, particularly pertinent 
to the frustrations regarding the dubious and deceitful online bookings and cancellations of ride-
hailing services like Bolt and Uber which both nations experiences alongside the increase in 
volume of online purchases made by Nigerians in South Africa; represent a significant 
manifestation of xenophobia, deeply intertwined with issues of national identity. These tensions 
are often expressed through social media, where economic competition, immigration, and 
cultural differences fuel hostile interactions. This study critically examines the role of digital 
platforms in escalating xenophobic rhetoric, exploring how online spaces shape and reflect 
broader societal attitudes. Additionally, it provides a moral evaluation of these conflicts, 
questioning the ethical implications of digital discourse and its impact on both nations' identities 
and relations in an increasingly interconnected world. The Social Identity Theory (SIT) was 
utilized in evaluating this work. This study employs a qualitative approach, incorporating 
analysis of social media discussions and conducting interviews with impacted individuals. 

THE DYNAMICS OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOUTH AFRICA AND NIGERIA

The relationship between South Africa and Nigeria is characterized by both rivalry and 
partnership, as they compete for influence in Africa while occasionally collaborating on regional 
and global issues. Odubajo et al (2017) examine the evolving relationship between Nigeria and 
South Africa, emphasizing their competition for regional dominance in Africa while pursuing 
national interests. The authors highlight that their interactions fluctuate between political conflict 
and cooperation. They conclude that both collaboration and competition shape their relations, 
and their ability to work together could benefit the African continent, though their pursuit of 
national interests may either foster or hinder this potential cooperation. Deliberating on the 
interplay of the relationship between South Africa and Nigeria, Adebajo (2019) accentuates that 
it is typified by both collaborations and competition. While they are pivotal to Africa's political 
and economic integration, tensions arise from differing perceptions. He intimates that Nigerians 
feel South Africans are ungrateful for Nigeria's role in the anti-apartheid struggle and see South 
African companies as dominating their market, while South Africans criticize Nigerian 
involvement in crime and face challenges doing business in Nigeria. Despite these differences, 
Adebajo delineates that both nations share economic, social, and political similarities and are 
vital players in shaping Africa's future.

Ogo et al (2015) analyzes the changing dynamics of the relationship between Nigeria and South 
Africa since Nigeria's independence. Initially, relations were strained due to Nigeria's anti-
apartheid stance, which the South African government viewed as hostile. However, in 1992, 
diplomatic ties improved following a visit from South African president De Klerk. While 
tensions arose during the Mandela-Abacha era, relations normalized under Mbeki and Obasanjo. 
The Zuma and Jonathan administrations faced diplomatic challenges, alternating between 
cooperation and discord. The authors argue that both countries, as Africa's largest economies, 
should prioritize friendly relations to promote mutual benefits and strengthen their bilateral ties. 
Ajiboye (2024) analyzes the economic relationship between South Africa and Nigeria from 2013 
to 2018; stressing that it is marked by significant trade, investment, and diplomatic interacting, 

142

                                            Aquino Journal of Philosophy, Vol 4 Issue 3, December 2024.
ISSN: 2786-9792



despite underlying tensions and challenges. According to the author, the period saw fluctuating 
trade volumes, peaking at $6.1 billion in 2014 and declining to $3.8 billion by 2018, influenced 
by commodity prices and regulatory issues. Both nations have made investments in each other's 
economies, particularly in telecommunications and banking, yet face challenges like trade 
imbalances and infrastructure limitations. Ajiboye's study highlights the need for improved 
cooperation through initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area (AFCFTA) and 
emphasizes the importance of transitioning from competitive to collaborative relations to 
enhance economic growth and regional integration. 

Bariledum et al (2022) while studying the foreign policies of Nigeria and South Africa alongside 
their contributions to African development, observe that while both nations are pivotal to Africa's 
progress, Nigeria's foreign policy has a greater impact compared to South Africa's. The authors 
illuminate that the relationship between the two countries has fluctuated between tension and 
cooperation, marked by regional leadership competition. They conclude that in order to 
effectively tackle current African challenges, Nigeria and South Africa should strengthen their 
ties and establish a collaborative political, economic and cultural agenda, with Nigeria 
recognizing South Africa's potential to alleviate some leadership pressures. Ogunnubi et al 
(2022) articulate the issue of xenophobia in South Africa and its effects on Nigeria-South Africa 
relations, highlighting the paradox of xenophobia attacks despite shared African ideals of unity. 
Discussing the rivalry and cooperation between the two countries; the authors argue that the 
Nigerian government's inadequate use of citizen diplomacy contributes to the prejudice and 
violence faced by Nigerians in South Africa. They propose policy recommendations to 
strengthen the Nigeria-South Africa partnership, including the implementation of a cultural mix 
policy and early warning systems to address and reduce xenophobic conflicts.

Odock (2002) while examining the shift in relations between Nigeria and South Africa from 
competition to cooperation attributes this change to evolving national interests and a shared goal 
of continental leadership amid globalization. The author argues that while this cooperation offers 
potential benefits, foreign multinational cooperation's dominate key economic sectors likely 
making them the primary beneficiaries. Additionally, difference in the internal class structures of 
the ruling elites in both countries may limit the depth of their cooperation, raising doubts about 
their ability to effectively tackle the challenges posed by globalization. 

MORAL ASSESSMENT OF THE DYNAMICS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN 
SOUTH AFRICA AND NIGERIA 

The findings from this study in conjunction with the insights from C. Ezenwokike, O. Otama, K. 
Ezelibe and J. Ozor (personal communication, September 3rd, 2024) exhibit that the relationship 
between South Africa and Nigeria is shaped by a complex interplay of historical, economic, 
political, and cultural factors. Both nations have endured colonial legacies and struggles for 
independence, particularly South Africa's fight against apartheid. This shared history 
underscores the importance of solidarity and mutual support among African nations as they work 
to overcome the lasting impacts of colonialism. A moral assessment of their dynamics promotes 
the necessity for collaboration rather than competition in fostering unity across the continent.  

As two of Africa's largest economies, Nigeria and South Africa often find themselves in 
competition for influence and resources, leading to ethical considerations around their economic 
interactions. This rivalry raises questions about the balance between cooperation and 
protectionism. A moral evaluation favours collaborative efforts in trade, investment, and 
infrastructure development, which can benefit both countries and contribute to regional stability. 
In the political arena, changes in leadership and differing policies can strain relations, 
emphasizing the need for respectful diplomatic engagement to promote peace and stability 
within the region.

143

Afunugo, Kenechi Nnaemeka                               Xenophobia And National Identity: A Study And Moral...



Social issues, including xenophobia in South Africa and the perceptions of Nigeria immigrants, 
require a moral lens that prioritizes empathy, understanding, and the rejection of discrimination. 
Both countries play crucial roles in the African Union and other regional organizations, and their 
collaboration on security and development issues reflects a moral responsibility to promote 
African unity and progress. Via fostering cultural exchanges and mutual respect for each other's 
traditions; South Africa and Nigeria have the opportunity to enrich their relationship, working 
together towards a more united and prosperous Africa while addressing contemporary 
challenges. 

NIGERIA-SOUTH AFRICA ONLINE DISPUTES OVER FRAUDULENT BOLT AND 
UBER DRIVERS ORDERS

The online tensions and conflict between Nigerians and South Africans apposite to the use of 
ride-hailing services like Bolt and Uber escalated with South Africans booking rides in Nigeria 
and canceling them to prank Nigerian drivers, causing financial losses and frustration. In 
retaliation, according to I. Mojekwu, O. Adebiti, N. Johnson, D. Newman, and L. Mohammed 
(Personal communication, September 5th, 2024), Nigerians started doing the same, booking and 
canceling rides in South Africa. This resulted in a price surge in cities like Cape Town and 
Johannesburg, leaving some South Africans stranded due to increased ride costs. 

Ikeji (2024) records that in retaliation to the recent “order war” initiated by South Africans, 
Nigerian users drove up taxi fares in South Africa by coordinating ride-hailing drivers to gather at 
particular spots. This follows South Africans bragging on X (formerly twitter) about 
intentionally wasting Nigerian driver's time by placing ride orders and then canceling them. Ikeji 
underscores that Nigerians and some South Africans expressed outrage over the prank, 
describing it as vile and cruel. Ezeamalu (2024) underlines that an X user, @i-am-feezah, 
criticized both South Africans and Nigerians for their actions in the Bolt conflict, pointing out 
that innocent drivers trying to support their families are the ones suffering.

Abdullahi (2024) details that the challenge sparked a social media debate, with Nigerians 
leveraging their larger population to dominate the prank. He further recounts that X users 
highlighted the financial disadvantage of the online war for South Africans. Some South Africans 
conceded defeat, while others expressed concerns over the impact on driver's livelihoods. 
Abdullahi notes that the rivalry intensified following the withdrawal of Nigeria born Chidinma 
Adetshina from the Miss South Africa pageant due to backlash over her nationality. Opanuga 
(2024) chronicles that Bolt Nigeria's country manager, Yahaya Mohammed, addressed the fake 
ride request issue involving individuals in Nigeria and South Africa, assuring measures to protect 
drivers and enhance platform security. Despite these steps, tensions between Nigerians and 
South Africans kept heightening online, with users in X exchanging heated remarks. Opanuga 
relates that some warn of worsening conflicts, while others highlight the risks of fueling 
animosity between the two nations. The online feud according to the author reflects deeper 
frustrations, with both sides engaging in banter and raising concerns about the real-world impact 
of the issue.

Jade Empress #ATE (2024, August 23) an X user, made a resounding statement regarding the 
issue against South Africans thus:

This time around you are targeting the Nigerians minding their own business in 
their own country? You cannot even use the excuse that it is because they are 
illegal in your country. They are in their own country, yet you are doing this. Later 
you people will deny the xenophobia when accused. (p.1).

Amara_Nwankpa (2024, August 23), another X user consents that “xenophobia harms random, 
innocent people” (p. 1). While Thabiso (2024 August 24), a South African X user delineates that: 

144

                                            Aquino Journal of Philosophy, Vol 4 Issue 3, December 2024.
ISSN: 2786-9792



“This is behind wrong. This guy is in his own country trying to make an honest living. Is your beef 
not with the illegal immigrants in South Africa Kanti? There's nothing funny about this, you are a 
horrible person” (p. 1).	 Maya (2024) enunciates in his own perspective that the situation of 
these online bookings is worsened by Nigeria's fuel scarcity and rising cost of living, with 
screenshots showing South Africans mocking their Nigerian victims in local languages. The 
author streamlines that in retaliation, Nigerians escalated the fake ride orders by engaging South 
African drivers in time-wasting conversations, giving absurd locations like “Illorin post office” 
in Cape Town. Maya illustrates that one Nigerian even joked about transporting human body 
parts, to which a South African driver shockingly agreed, offering advice on packaging. 
According to his documentation, Nigerians vowed to continue these pranks, with one X user 
stating, “we go lower until we find oil” (p. 3). The synopsis of Maya's report showcases that Uber 
and Bolt apps can be easily manipulated for mischief, allowing users to book riders in other 
countries without detection. Kupemba et al (2024) elucidate that Bolt subsequently suspended 
accounts and restricted inter-country ride requests due to the rise in fake ride booking between 
Nigeria and South Africa, impacting its operations. They intimate that Bolt confirmed that the 
restriction only applies to Nigeria and South Africa.

 

NIGERIA'S NETIZENS EXTENDING ONLINE DISPUTE TO FRAUDULENT 
ORDERING OF ONLINE GOODS

Zage (2024) records that the online conflict went beyond ride-hailing requests, with some 
Nigerians placing fake food orders from South Africa businesses, as illustrated in an X user's post 
(cited by Zage) to wit: “South Africa has restaurants where you can order food and pay upon 
delivery. I am not saying anything” (p.1). This statement by Harry @chiditweets,042 August 22, 
2024 (cited by Zage), highlights a practice in South African restaurants where customers can 
order food and pay upon delivery. The X user thus was calling attention to Nigerian Netizens to 
use that platform in frustrating the South Africans more by ordering fraudulent online food to 
frustrate South Africans online fast food vendors. 

Zage (2024) details that the tension between Nigeria and South Africa stems from xenophobic 
attacks on Nigerians in South Africa, particularly in 2019 when Nigerian-owned businesses were 
targeted. He stresses that while Nigerians in South Africa often possess better skill and education, 
locals accuse them of organized crime. Despite this, Nigeria historically supported South Africa 
during apartheid, issuing passports to South Africans, boycotting events, and raising awareness 
through cultural contributions. The author maintains that the future of the relationship between 
South Africa and Nigeria depends on resolving underlying issues and rebuilding mutual respect.  

Jaiyeola (2024) specified that there were also Nigerians who visited online relationship sites, 
seeking to connect with new friends with the motive of frustrating them. Lethabo Francina (cited 
by Jaiyeola) shared on her X account that “someone asked me to wait for him on a street in South 
Africa, but after two hours, I realized it was all just a prank” (p. 3). One can thus reckon the height 
of the online beef. Ikeji (2024) assents that Nigerians later intensified the online war by targeting 
additional South African businesses, including restaurants offering pay-on-delivery services, in a 
coordinated effort to disrupt operations as act of retaliation.	

 

THE REMOTE CAUSES OF TENSION BETWEEN SOUTH AFRICANS AND 
NIGERIANS IN DIGITAL AND PHYSICAL SPACES

Udeoji (2017) asserts that the remote causes of the online and physical crises between South 
Africa and Nigeria stem from a combination of ineffective migration control leading to increased 
migrant influx, poor governance resulting in unemployment and socioeconomic challenges, 
fears among South Africans about job competition and identity loss due to migrants, and the 

145

Afunugo, Kenechi Nnaemeka                               Xenophobia And National Identity: A Study And Moral...



involvement of some Nigerians in criminal activities. She avers that these factors contribute to 
ongoing xenophobic violence against Nigerian migrants, including extrajudicial killings, which 
threaten regional stability and hinder economic integration efforts in Africa. Nwanganga et al 
(2022) in their study, highlights that the tension between South Africa in both digital and physical 
spaces is rooted in the deepening poverty among South Africans, which has been linked to the 
rising incidence of xenophobic attacks on Nigerians and other foreign nationals in South Africa. 
The South African government's failure to effectively address these attacks has contributed to a 
culture of xenophobia exacerbated by economic hardship and social unrest. The authors posit 
that this environment of fear and hostility is fueled by misconceptions about migrants taking jobs 
and resources, creating a volatile atmosphere that affects both digital and physical interactions 
between South Africans and Nigerians.

Ultimately, from the findings of this study apposite to the recent online tensions between South 
Africa and Nigeria, the remote causes of the conflict between the two nations both in digital and 
physical spaces stem from various underlying causes, primarily rooted in economic competition 
and xenophobia. Many Nigerians migrate to South Africa in search of better opportunities, 
leading to perceptions among South Africans that these immigrants are taking jobs and resources 
amid existing high unemployment rates. This competition fosters resentment and a sense of 
rivalry, exacerbated by waves of xenophobic violence directed at Nigerians, who are often 
scapegoated for comprehensive economic frustrations. This animosity is further fueled by 
stereotypes portraying Nigerians as heavily involved in criminal activities, such as drug 
trafficking and internet fraud, which fosters distrust and deepens societal divides.

Additionally, the historical relationship between the two nations has evolved negatively since 
Nigeria's support for South Africa during apartheid, with contemporary political and diplomatic 
tensions surfacing during episodes of xenophobia or inflammatory rhetoric from leaders. Social 
media has amplified these tensions, as incidents of violence against Nigerians are widely shared, 
often leading to heated discussions and misinformation. Cultural differences and 
misunderstandings further contribute to the strain, as varying values and communication styles 
can lead to conflict in everyday interactions, both online and in urban communications. This 
complex interplay of factors creates an ongoing atmosphere of hostility and resentment between 
the two countries.

SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY (SIT)

Neighbors et al (2013) posit that Social Identity Theory examines how being part of a group 
shapes one's self-image and influences how one view others within their peculiar group, those 
outside it, and members of competing groups. The theory has been widely applied to understand 
why people tend to favour their own group (in-group favouritism) and discriminate against those 
not in their group (out-group bias).

McLeod (2023) expounds that Social Identity Theory developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner 
in the 1970s, suggests that a significant part of an individual's self-concept comes from their 
association with social groups. The theory aims to explain the mental processes and social 
conditions that drive intergroup behaviour, particularly in relation to prejudice, bias, and 
discrimination. The author stresses that a person's social identity is shaped by the groups they 
belong to, forming an important aspect of their sense of self. McLeod intimates that in 1979, 
Tajfel and Turner argued that belonging to groups – whether it is one's nationality, social class, 
family, or sports team – serves as a major source of pride and self-worth.

Ellemers (2024) declares that in social psychology, Social Identity Theory explores the 
relationship between personal identity and group identity. It seeks to clarify and predicts when 
people view themselves as unique individuals versus members of a group. The theory also 

146

                                            Aquino Journal of Philosophy, Vol 4 Issue 3, December 2024.
ISSN: 2786-9792



examines how both personal and social identities influence individual perceptions and group 
behaviour. 

EVALUATING THE DIGITAL TENSION BETWEEN SOUTH AFRICANS AND 
NIGERIANS USING SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY

Social Identity Theory (SIT) suggests that individuals categorize themselves and others into 
groups, forming part of their self-concept based on their group memberships. In this context, 
South Africans and Nigerians, belonging to distinct national identities, experience a sense of in-
group verses out-group competition. Negative stereotyping, reinforced by past conflicts such as 
xenophobic attacks in South Africa and perceptions of economic competition, amplifies this 
tension. Nigerians are often portrayed in South African media and digital spaces as competitors 
for jobs and resources, while Nigerians, in turn, view these reactions as unfair and discriminatory. 

According to Social Identity Theory, individuals derive their self-esteem from their group 
identity and any perceived threat to the status or dominance of their group, leads to defensive 
behaviour. On digital platforms, this results in South Africans and Nigerians displaying 
behaviours that reinforce their national superiority. South Africans may argue about sovereignty, 
the protection of local resources, and the impact of Nigerian immigration, while Nigerian 
emphasize their entrepreneurial spirit and contributions to the South African economy. These 
digital interactions become polarized, with both groups engaging in collective self-affirmation, 
further deepening the divide.

Furthermore, evaluating the recent digital tension between South Africans and Nigerians 
regarding fraudulent online booking of Ubers and goods from the lens of Social Identity Theory; 
one underscores that both groups perceive each other as distinct in-groups and out-groups. South 
Africans often attribute these fraudulent activities to Nigerians, reinforcing negative stereotypes 
and deepening the divide. In turn, Nigerians feel unfairly targeted and defend their collective 
identity, leading to heightened online conflict. These cycles of attacks, counter-attacks, blames, 
and defenses are fueled by social competition, comparison and antagonism, where each group 
focuses on preserving its national image while amplifying the negative traits of the other.   

It is imperative to reinforce that social comparison which is a key aspect of Social Identity Theory 
ignites social competition which produces social antagonism. This also explains why the 
tensions persist online. Each group compares itself to the other, often highlighting positive traits 
within their in-group and focusing on negative traits of the out-group. These comparisons are 
often exacerbated by sensationalized news, cultural differences, and economic disparities, 
creating a cycle of digital hostility. This dynamic can also extend to the diaspora, where South 
Africans and Nigerians engage in debates over national pride and cultural identity, often 
reinforcing the negative stereotypes that lead to further division and online conflict. 

MORAL EVALUATION OF DIGITAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN SOUTH AFRICANS 
AND NIGERIANS 

The digital conflicts between South Africans and Nigerians often seen on social media can be 
morally evaluated through the lens of ethics, mutual respect, the psychological backlash 
associated with it, and the value of intercultural dialogues. These online clashes are usually 
rooted in xenophobia, competition, and misinformation, with users from both sides engaging in 
harmful generalizations and accusations that deepen divisions rather than promoting 
understanding. An ethical perspective suggests that the propagation of hate speech, stereotyping, 
and cyber-bullying violates the principles of human dignity and mutual respect. These digital 
conflicts foster intolerance and perpetuate false narratives about both groups, ignoring the shared 
histories and struggles both nations have faced, especially regarding colonialism and economic 

147

Afunugo, Kenechi Nnaemeka                               Xenophobia And National Identity: A Study And Moral...



hardship. The ease of spreading misinformation online exacerbates tensions, as sensationalist 
posts and divisive rhetoric gain traction more rapidly than calls for unity and peace.

The moral implications also extend to the psychological and emotional well-being of individuals 
involved in or exposed to these digital conflicts. Online hate speech and xenophobic rhetoric 
have tangible consequences, creating a toxic environment that fosters anxiety, stress, and even 
fear among those targeted. Such hostile interactions undermine efforts to build cross-cultural 
friendships and alliances that could otherwise foster solidarity between the two nations. For 
bystanders, especially younger generations exposed to these digital exchanges, it sets a negative 
example of how differences should be addressed, reinforcing harmful patterns of 
communication. Africans are celebrated for their deep sense of oneness and togetherness, a 
cultural ethos exemplified by the “Ubuntu philosophy”, which emphasizes that “I am because we 
are” pertinent to the elucidation of Samkange et al (1980). This communal spirit is integral to 
African identity, fostering harmony and mutual support across diverse cultures. Consequently, 
cyber-bullying, particularly between South Africans and Nigerians, is profoundly alien to this 
worldview. Such actions undermine the foundational values of solidarity and interconnectedness 
that African societies cherish. Therefore, cyber-bullying should be actively discouraged, as it 
contradicts the very principles that bind Africans together. 

Consequently, a moral solution to these conflicts would involve using digital platforms for 
constructive dialogue, promoting empathy, and recognizing the shared humanity of all 
participants. Social media could serve as a pace for educating each other on cultural differences, 
encouraging collaboration, and finding common ground in regional development, 
entrepreneurship, and addressing social injustices. By choosing kindness and understanding over 
hostility, both South Africans and Nigerians can shift these online interactions toward 
reconciliation and mutual respect.       

CONCLUSION

This study offers valuable insights into how online interactions can fuel and reflect broader social 
tensions. The research highlights how these conflicts are often rooted in historical grievances, 
socio-economic disparities and cultural stereotypes. Digital platforms, as spaces for free 
expression, often amplify these tension by providing a stage for both constructive dialogue and 
harmful rhetoric. The analysis underscores the complexity of national identity in a globalized 
world and reveals how the internet has become a battle ground for expressing, defending, and 
sometimes attacking collective identities. Ultimately, this study provides a nuanced view of the 
ongoing struggles over belonging and acceptance in a multicultural society.

However, the research has limitations. It primarily focuses on digital interactions and interviews 
with people engaged which may not fully capture the depth of offline relationship and other 
socio-political factors influencing xenophobic attitudes. The scope is also restricted by the 
availability and accessibility of online data, which may not reflect the entire spectrum of the 
populations involved. Furthermore, the study's reliance on digital content, which is often 
anonymized or pseudonymous, poses challenge in verifying the authenticity of the sentiments 
expressed. This limitation suggests that while digital platforms provide significant insights, they 
cannot comprehensively represent the realities and complexities of offline experiences and 
identity struggles.

Notwithstanding that this paper is by no means exhaustive; it has made a valuable contribution to 
understanding the role of digital interfaces in intensifying conflicts and tensions between 
nationalities. Further research could benefit from a broader scope that includes offline 
interviews, ethnographic studies, and longitudinal analyses to better understand the roots and 
consequences of these conflicts. Additionally, examining similar xenophobic tension in other 

148

                                            Aquino Journal of Philosophy, Vol 4 Issue 3, December 2024.
ISSN: 2786-9792



regions or between different national groups could provide a comparative perspective, 
highlighting universal themes and unique regional dynamics. In diversifying methodologies and 
expanding the geographic focus, further studies can deepen the understanding of how digital and 
offline identities intersect and influence one another in an increasingly interconnected world.    

RECOMMENDATIONS

This study proffers the following potential recommendations pertinent to its findings:

1. Promotion of digital literacy alongside educational curricula reform. Programs that 
encourage Netizens (Users) on identifying misinformation and understanding the 
complexities of immigration and national identity to combat xenophobia online should 
be enhanced. Effort should be made by the governments of both South Africa and Nigeria 
to integrate topics related to xenophobia, migration, and national identity into school 
curricula to foster a culture of acceptance from a young age. 

2. Strengthening cross-cultural dialogues together with community engagement initiatives. 
There should be concerted efforts by both nations stakeholders targeted at facilitating 
discussions and workshop to foster mutual understanding and address stereotypes. Local 
initiatives that involve both South African and Nigerian nationals in community-building 
activities to enhance solidarity should be encouraged and appropriated.

3. Policy implementation in addition to research and documentation. Those in the reins of 
government alongside the citizens of both South Africa and Nigeria should advocate for 
policies that address the root causes of xenophobia, including economic disparities, and 
ensure fair treatment of immigrants. They should also encourage ongoing research into 
the impacts of xenophobia and national identity to inform policy makers and community 
leaders. 

4. The  government of both South Africa and Nigeria should leverage on the intelligence 
and capacity of their digital experts to urge and ensure that digital platforms takes more 
active role in monitoring and moderating hate speech, while promoting positive 
narratives about diversity.

REFERENCES

Abdullahi, I. (2024, August 23). ICYMI: Race for dominance: Nigerians, South Africans in 
Bolt ordering battle. PUNCH. .https://punchng.com

Adebajo, A. (2019, May 29). Dr. AdekeyeAdebajo on Nigeria and South Africa. IPI Global 
Observatory. .https://www.ipinst.org/2019/03/

Ajiboye, D.O. (2024). Economic Relations between South Africa and Federal Republic of 
Nigeria from (2013-2017). Research Gate. Doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.36171.81441.

Bariledum, K. et al. (2022). A comparative study of Nigeria and South Africa Foreign Policies 
Achievements in Africa. International Journal of comparative studies in International 
Relations and Development, 8(1), 19-35.

Ellemers, N. (2024, September 13). Social Identity Theory, encyclopedia Britannica. 
https://www.britannica.com/topic/social/identity-theory.

Ezeamalu, B. (2024, August 23). PRANK CALLS: South Africa Nigeria: Rivalry spills out 
into ride-sharing chaos. The Africa Report. .https://www.theafricareport.com/359250/

Hochwald, T. (2024). How Do Social Media Affect Intra-State Conflicts other than war? PFP 
consortium of Defense Academics and Security Institutes – Connections – The 
Quarterly Journal. . https://connections.qj.org/article

149

Afunugo, Kenechi Nnaemeka                               Xenophobia And National Identity: A Study And Moral...

https://punchng.com
https://www.ipinst.org/2019/03/
https://www.britannica.com/topic/social/identity-theory
https://www.theafricareport.com/359250/
https://connections.qj.org/article


Ikeji, L. (2024). Nigerians disrupt South African ride-hailing services and other business in 
response to online “order war”. Linda Ikeji's blog. 
https://m.lindaikejiasblog.com/2024/8/.

Jaiyeola, T. (2024, August 25). How Bolt's cross-country feature fueled Nigeria- South Africa 
row. Business Day. .https://www.google.com/amp/s/businessday.ng/news/article/

Kupemba, D.N. et al. (2024, August 23). Bolt acts to halt Nigeria – South Africa “taxi-war”. 
BBCNEWS. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news.

Maya, D. (2024, August 22). War of rides: Nigerians and South Africans launch fake orders 
on Bolt and Uber app. Technext Newsletter. .https://technext24.com/2024/08/22

Mcleod, S. (2023, October 5). Social Identity Theory in Psychology (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). 
Simply psychology. .https://www.simplypsychology.org/social.identity.theory.html

Neighbors, C. et al. (2013). Peer influences on addiction. In P.M. Miller (Ed.) Principles of 
Addiction (pp. 323-331). Academic press.

Niekerk,  V. et al (2013). Social Media and Information Conflict. International Journal of 
Communication, 7, 1162-1184.

Nwanganga, M. et al. (2022). Xenophobic Attacks and Nigerian–South African Relations: 
Investigating the cause. Indiana Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences, 3(1), 70-
79.

Odock, C.N. (2002). Nigeria and South Africa: The Politics of Continental Leadership. 
Global Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 11-27.

Odubajo T. et al. (2017). Nigeria and South Africa: Collaboration or Competition? South 
African Journal of International Affairs, 24(1), 61-77.

Ogo, N.C. et al. (2015). A Historical Anatomy of Nigeria-South Africa Relations since the end 
of Apartheid. Journal of African Foreign Affairs, 2(1/2), 49-74).

Ogunnubi, O. et al. (2022). Citizen Diplomacy in Nigeria-South Africa Relation: Confronting 
the Paradox of Xenophobia. Journal Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 9(3), 133-151.

Opanuga, J. (2024, August 22). Online feud between South Africa, Nigeria escalates to “Bolt 
for bolt” trend. The Guardian. .https://guardian.ng.news

Proctor, K. (2021). Social media and conflict. Understanding risks and resilience–Research 
findings from Ethiopia, Iraq, Myanmar, and Nigeria. Mercy Corps. 
https://www.mercycorps.org.

Samkange, S. et al. (1980). Hunhuism or Ubuntuism: A Zimbabwe Indigenous Political 
Philosophy. Graham. 

Udeoji, E.A. (2017). Socio-political crises between South Africans and Nigerian Migrants: 
Causes, challenges and implications. South East Journal of Political Science, 3(1), 1-
15.

Uzochukwu, C.E et al. (2019). Social media, Hate speech and conflict. Interplay of 
influences. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Review, 9(1), 14-
158.

Zage, Z. (2024, August 27). Everything you should know about the Nigeria vs South Africa 
“online ride-hailing war”. Global voices. https://www.google.com/amp/s/globa/voices. 
org/2024/08/27.

Zeitzoff, T. (2017). How Social Media is changing conflict. Journal of Conflicts Resolution, 
61. Doi:10.1176/0022002717721382.

150

                                            Aquino Journal of Philosophy, Vol 4 Issue 3, December 2024.
ISSN: 2786-9792

https://m.lindaikejiasblog.com/2024/8/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/businessday.ng/news/article/
https://technext24.com/2024/08/22
https://www.simplypsychology.org/social.identity.theory.html
https://guardian.ng.news
https://www.mercycorps.org
https://www.google.com/amp/s/globa/voices.%20org/2024/08/27
https://www.google.com/amp/s/globa/voices.%20org/2024/08/27

